The Return (Andrei Zvyagintsev, 2003)

The more I think about The Return, the more it grows on me. I watched this in class yesterday, and my teacher introduced it as something of a neo-Tarkovsky, at least in style. While I’m not entirely familiar with his work, I can understand where he’s coming from, especially stylistically. It’s easily one of the best looking films I’ve seen in years, as every scene seems drenched with water and every shot constructed with meticulous attention to detail. One has a sense of watching a film, and I mean this in the best way possible. The film is painted broadly, as the characters are at the very least archetypes of classic ideals and stereotypes. The exploration of the father figure in particular is fascinating, as clearly he is trying his best but is doomed to failure because he is never there. It’s an obvious, but crucial fault that he can’t be a good father because he was absent, and his son can never trust him because he was gone for so long.

Some suggest the father figure best represents “Mother Russia”, a somewhat useless and distant presence that appears now and then under a veil of good intentions, but without the knowledge or capabilities to actually help anyone. Not culturally, and only somewhat politically familiar with Russia I can’t really defend or argue the point. On a broader analysis, it makes sense though, and the thinly painted lives of the characters lend themselves to this kind of interpretation. While the film never condemns his actions, it does work hard at invoking a mistrust in his actions and life. It’s clear there are many lies enveloping our understanding of him, and as a result we can never truly appreciate his efforts to be a good father.

The film’s final act is an eruption of emotions and confrontations as characters finally come to terms with their experiences. It’s one of the most surprising and emotionally involving finales in recent years. On repeated viewings, I actually think The Return might be included among my favourites. Really a startling and beautiful film.

4 responses to “The Return (Andrei Zvyagintsev, 2003)

  1. Yeah, I saw this when it came out and it struck me as something of a tease, raising mysteries about the kids’ father and where he’s been, and then refusing to resolve them. Anyway, it’s definitely one I need to rewatch one of these days.

  2. I think it worked in context of the film, although it still left me and a few others wishing they’d at least toss us a little bone. I think it distracts, however slightly, from what they set out to do.

  3. Yeah, this movie is terrific. It was on my top 10 at the end of that year. I’m jealous that you get to watch this in class. I really should’ve been to film school! But then again, I wouldn’t know what to do with myself if I graduated from that. Haha doh!

  4. IT’s wonderful, we get to watch it on a projector (still digital), and discuss the film before and afterward. At this point, I’m not risking too much since I only go to University next year. At the very least I learn to operate a ton of software, and am forced to write and operate effectively in group environments which apparently many different people are looking for in the job market. I have no idea what I’m going to do with my life though

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s